Mutation Hotspots challenge Neo-Darwinism

The article "Crossovers are associated with mutation and biased gene conversion at recombination hotspots" by Kong et al. presents direct evidence that crossing over, a key process in meiosis, is mutagenic. The authors sequenced large numbers of single crossover molecules obtained from human sperm for two recombination hotspots and found that crossovers carried more de novo mutations than nonrecombinant DNA molecules analyzed for the same donors and hotspots.

The authors also found that GC alleles, which are more likely to be methylated (epigenetics), were preferentially transmitted during crossing over, opposing mutation. This GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) predominated over mutation in the sequence evolution of hotspots. These findings suggest that gBGC may be an adaptation to counteract the mutational load of recombination.

The article's findings are significant because they provide direct evidence that crossing over is an important source of new mutations in the human germline. This has implications for our understanding of human evolution and disease risk.

Here is a more detailed summary of the article's findings:

• Crossovers are mutagenic. Crossovers carry more de novo mutations than nonrecombinant DNA molecules.

• GC alleles are preferentially transmitted during crossing over. This is known as GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC).

• gBGC predominates over mutation in the sequence evolution of recombination hotspots.

The authors hypothesize that gBGC may be an adaptation to counteract the mutational load of recombination. This is because methylated CpG sites, which are more likely to be GC-rich, are more prone to double-strand break formation, the first step in crossing over. gBGC could help to repair these breaks and reduce the number of mutations that occur.

The authors' findings are based on a relatively small sample size, so more research is needed to confirm their results. However, the study provides important new insights into the role of crossing over in mutation and human evolution.

---

The article challenges neo-Darwinism in the following ways:

• It shows that biased gene conversion can favor the transmission of certain alleles over others non randomly. This can lead to a reduction in genetic diversity.

• It suggests that the mutational and biased gene conversion events that occur at recombination hotspots can play a significant role in the evolution of these hotspots. This is because recombination hotspots are frequently mutated and converted, which can lead to changes in their sequence and function.

These findings challenge neo-Darwinism because they suggest that recombination, a process that is essential for neo-Darwinian evolution, can also lead to harmful mutations and a reduction in genetic diversity. Additionally, the findings suggest that recombination hotspots, which are important sites of recombination-driven evolution, can be themselves shaped by the mutational and biased gene conversion events that occur at these sites.

The findings from the article challenge many aspects of neo-Darwinism.

Here are some specific examples of how the findings from the article challenge neo-Darwinism:

• Neo-Darwinism typically assumes that mutations are random events. However, the findings from the article suggest that recombination can lead to an increase in mutation rates at recombination hotspots. This suggests that mutations are not random as neo-Darwinism assumes.

• Neo-Darwinism typically assumes that natural selection is the main force driving evolution. However, the findings from the article suggest that biased gene conversion can favor the transmission of certain alleles over others, even if these alleles are harmful. This suggests that biased gene conversion can also play a significant role in evolution.

• Neo-Darwinism assumes that recombination is a beneficial process that helps to increase genetic diversity and promote adaptation. However, the findings from the article suggest that recombination can also lead to harmful mutations and a reduction in genetic diversity at recombination hotspots. This suggests that recombination may not always be beneficial, as neo-Darwinism typically assumes.

Overall, the findings from the article suggest that recombination is a more complex process than neo-Darwinism typically assumes. They also suggest that recombination can play a role in both beneficial and harmful evolutionary changes.

---

Article Snippets

Crossovers are associated with mutation and biased gene conversion at recombination hotspots.

meiosis is an important source of germline mutations.

sites of meiotic recombination experience recurrent double-strand breaks at hotspots, recombination has been previously suspected to be mutagenic.

found more new mutations in molecules with a crossover than in molecules without a recombination event.

GC alleles are transmitted more often than AT alleles at polymorphic sites.

mutagenesis and biased transmission occur during crossing over in meiosis and are important modifiers of the sequence content at recombination hotspots.

Meiosis is a potentially important source of germline mutations, as sites of meiotic recombination experience recurrent double-strand breaks (DSBs).

we find direct evidence that recombination is mutagenic: Crossovers carry more de novo mutations than nonrecombinant DNA molecules analyzed for the same donors and hotspots.

mutations were primarily CG to TA transitions, with a higher frequency of transitions at CpG than non-CpGs sites.

This enrichment of mutations at CpG sites at hotspots could predominate in methylated regions involving frequent single-stranded DNA processing as part of DSB repair.

GC alleles are preferentially transmitted during crossing over, opposing mutation, and shows that GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) predominates over mutation in the sequence evolution of hotspots.

gBGC could be an adaptation to counteract the mutational load of recombination.