Demystifying Complexity: A Deep Dive into "Evolution of Complexity. Molecular Aspects of Preassembly"



Demystifying Complexity: A Deep Dive into "Evolution of Complexity. Molecular Aspects of Preassembly"

The evolutionary journey toward biological complexity has long captivated scientists and philosophers. How did simple, single-celled organisms lay the groundwork for the awe-inspiring diversity of life we see today? This question drives the discussion in "Evolution of Complexity. Molecular Aspects of Preassembly," a thought-provoking article that adds a fascinating challenge to the traditional narratives of Darwinian evolution.

Central to the article is the concept of preassembly. This proposes that the genetic building blocks for many complex traits existed long before their actual emergence. Imagine a vast library of "non-coding" DNA, silent sequences seemingly untouched by natural selection. Yet, according to preassembly, this seemingly inert material holds the hidden potential for revolutionary change.

Through intricate molecular mechanisms, segments of this non-coding (Junk) DNA can be repurposed, shuffled, and transformed into entirely new functional genes. These de novo genes, born afresh from previously unused genetic material, can then pave the way for novel adaptations and the blossoming of biological complexity.

The implications of preassembly are far-reaching, offering explanations for some of evolution's most perplexing riddles:

  • The Cambrian Explosion: This sudden outburst of diverse life forms around 500 million years ago seemed to defy gradualistic evolution. Preassembly suggests that the genetic toolkit for these innovations may have been brewing in non-coding DNA for eons, ready to be unleashed under the right selective pressures.

  • Rapid Evolutionary Bursts: Traits like echolocation in bats or the intricate floral structures of angiosperms appear abruptly in the fossil record. Preassembly proposes that the necessary genes weren't built from neo darwinian scratch but repurposed and refined from existing reservoirs, enabling rapid evolutionary leaps.

  • Excess Complexity: Traits like human intelligence or animal play, seemingly exceeding immediate survival needs, can be puzzling under traditional Darwinian logic. Preassembly offers a different perspective, suggesting these traits might be byproducts of a more general tinkering with non-coding DNA, occasionally yielding unexpected yet potentially advantageous functions.

Preassembly raises questions about Darwinian evolution. Preassembly adds a layer of hidden potential, a vast reservoir of untapped creativity within the genome.

The article delves deeper into the fascinating molecular mechanisms underpinning preassembly. It explores phenomena like transposable elements, epigenetic modifications, and alternative splicing, all intricate dance moves in the cellular symphony of innovation.

While the research on preassembly is still in its nascent stages, the potential significance is undeniable. It offers a fresh perspective on the evolutionary dance, highlighting the crucial role of previously overlooked players in the drama of life's unfolding complexity.

Moving beyond the article, several compelling questions and avenues for further exploration emerge:

  • How widespread is preassembly in the natural world? Does it play a role in the evolution of all lineages, or is it restricted to specific groups or adaptations?

  • Can we identify specific triggers or environmental pressures that promote the activation of preassembly mechanisms?

  • Can we harness the understanding of preassembly to develop new biotechnologies, perhaps by artificially stimulating the emergence of novel traits or functions?

"Evolution of Complexity. Molecular Aspects of Preassembly" is a stimulating and thought-provoking piece. It pushes the boundaries of our understanding of evolution, highlighting the hidden depths of genetic potential and the intricate dances playing out within the cell. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of life, preassembly offers a captivating lens through which to witness the breathtaking unfolding of biological complexity.

Article Snippets:

No gradual improvements in echolocation development, from simple to complex and consistent with neo-Darwinism, have been found in Nature, past or present.

Hundreds of genes are no doubt involved with echolocation, leaving evolutionists with the unanswered question, “How did they arise?”

A large but unknown number of concurrent mutations is likely needed to achieve even the simplest echolocation system. But mutations are rare and mainly harmful, so that an extended time-period must ensue before an entire family of mutations is ultimately acquired.

But if the newly formed genes failed to manifest any benefit, then there was no obvious bio-criteria by which natural selection could favorably screen them.

The neo-Darwinian “one-tiny-mutation-at-a-time” mechanism leaves one perplexed as to how early echolocation mutations (genes that could not impart echolocation by themselves) would have been spread across the population by natural selection.

Bear in mind a basic tenet of neo-Darwinism: the mechanism is not predictive of future capabilities. Natural selection would not have fostered genes whose utility manifested itself only eons after the genes’ actual appearances.

Durrett and Schmidt who calculated the waiting time for a pair of pre-specified mutations. They selected for their model a Drosophila mutation that inactivates a transcription factor waiting for a second mutation that reestablishes the trait. The results, which are strongly dependent upon a series of reasonable assumptions (concerning nucleotide mutation rate, population, neutrality of mutations etc.), show that the second specific mutation appears after a wait of 9 million years!

Evolutionists are well aware of the statistical problems just mentioned. In fact, it is for this reason that neo-Darwinism must assume a myriad of tiny accessible steps, each of them being increasingly profitable to the organism. But the lack of discrete intermediates in echolocation, demanded by this mechanism, discredits such a proposal.

A more broadly based evolutionary theory, one that includes a faster and less “piecemeal” structure-development, is called for.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Natural Selection has not been accurately measured since Darwin

Image
Francis Crick's term "frozen accident" falsely described the seeming rigidity of the genetic code, its apparent inability to accommodate additional amino acids beyond the standard 20. This observation had puzzled scientists for decades, as the genetic code seems to have reached a plateau in its expansion despite the potential for incorporating new amino acids with novel properties. NeoDarwinian thinking reasoned greater natural selection could occur with more codons. Several hypotheses were put forward to explain this apparent standstill in the genetic code's evolution. Crick and others  eventually applied natural selection to think redundant codons were neutral as to account for neutral selection . The question of why the genetic code stopped incorporating new amino acids remained a fascinating topic in evolutionary biology till Cas9 Crispr. The redundancy of codons, where multiple codons can specify the same amino acid, has long been considered a neutr
Read more

Greatest threat to Evolution in 60 years

Image
60 years of evolution studies are threatened by nonneutral synonymous mutations. Synonymous mutations are mutations that change a codon in a gene but do not change the amino acid that is encoded by that codon. For many years, synonymous mutations were thought to be neutral, meaning that they had no effect on the fitness of an organism. However, recent research has shown that this is not always the case. In fact, many synonymous mutations can have a negative effect on fitness. This is because synonymous mutations can affect the way in which a gene is expressed. For example, a synonymous mutation can change the structure of a gene transcript, which can make it more difficult for the gene to be translated into a protein. Synonymous mutations can also affect the rate at which a gene is transcribed or translated. The discovery that synonymous mutations can be nonneutral has important implications for the study of evolution. For example, it means that we need to be more careful w
Read more

The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas

Image
“The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis are, if not outright overturned, replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution. So, not to mince words, the Modern Synthesis is gone.” -EV Koonin, cited by over 250,000 scientists. The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas As the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin's epochal "On the Origin of Species" casts a long shadow, evolutionary biologist Eugene V. Koonin throws down a gauntlet in his essay "The Origin at 150: Is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight?" He contends that the Modern Synthesis, the reigning framework since the 1950s, has crumbled under the weight of post-genomic discoveries. This audacious claim compels us to ask: has the ship of evolutionary understanding truly run aground, and if so, can a new v
Read more