Epigenetic "Bet Hedging" beyond Darwin


Explanation of the article "Bet-hedging and variability in plant development: seed germination and beyond" by Abley et al. (2024), incorporating insights on how it challenges neo-Darwinism:

Bet-Hedging as an Evolutionary Strategy in Plants

The article explores the concept of bet-hedging developmental stochasticity in plants. This process introduces phenotypic variation (observable traits) in offspring despite their identical genes. This variability proves advantageous in unpredictable environments, prompting a reconsideration of the neo-Darwinian view of evolution, which traditionally emphasizes genetic mutations and natural selection as the sole drivers.

The Power of Diversity: How Bet-Hedging Works


Plants utilize bet-hedging as a strategy to ensure offspring survival in fluctuating environments. By producing offspring with diverse phenotypes, they increase the probability that some will possess traits best suited for the prevailing conditions. For instance, some seeds within a population may germinate earlier, while others may delay germination. This variation ensures that some seeds will emerge during favorable conditions, maximizing the population's chance of reproductive success.

Beyond Germination: Variability Throughout the Lifecycle

The concept of bet-hedging extends beyond seed germination. The article highlights that plants can exhibit variability in other traits as well, such as flowering time or resource allocation. This phenotypic diversity enhances their chances of thriving in a changing environment. For example, some plants may flower earlier in unpredictable environments, ensuring reproduction before unfavorable conditions arrive.

Challenging Neo-Darwinism: Unveiling New Mechanisms

This research challenges the neo-Darwinian view of evolution. Traditionally, neo-Darwinism emphasizes genetic mutations and subsequent natural selection as the sole drivers of phenotypic variation and adaptation. However, bet-hedging suggests that phenotypic variation can arise through non-genetic mechanisms, specifically through random fluctuations during development. This highlights the complexity of plant development and adaptation, paving the way for a more nuanced understanding of evolutionary processes in plants.

This challenges the idea that genes are the sole units of selection in neo-Darwinism.

Moving Beyond the Neo-Darwinian Framework

By acknowledging the role of bet-hedging, researchers can move beyond the limitations of the neo-Darwinian view and gain a deeper understanding of how plants adapt and thrive in a constantly changing world. The study of bet-hedging opens new avenues for exploring the intricate interplay between genetics, environment, and developmental plasticity in shaping plant phenotypes. This knowledge can be instrumental in agricultural practices, allowing for the development of more resilient crops better equipped to handle environmental variations.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Natural Selection has not been accurately measured since Darwin

Image
Francis Crick's term "frozen accident" falsely described the seeming rigidity of the genetic code, its apparent inability to accommodate additional amino acids beyond the standard 20. This observation had puzzled scientists for decades, as the genetic code seems to have reached a plateau in its expansion despite the potential for incorporating new amino acids with novel properties. NeoDarwinian thinking reasoned greater natural selection could occur with more codons. Several hypotheses were put forward to explain this apparent standstill in the genetic code's evolution. Crick and others  eventually applied natural selection to think redundant codons were neutral as to account for neutral selection . The question of why the genetic code stopped incorporating new amino acids remained a fascinating topic in evolutionary biology till Cas9 Crispr. The redundancy of codons, where multiple codons can specify the same amino acid, has long been considered a neutr
Read more

Greatest threat to Evolution in 60 years

Image
60 years of evolution studies are threatened by nonneutral synonymous mutations. Synonymous mutations are mutations that change a codon in a gene but do not change the amino acid that is encoded by that codon. For many years, synonymous mutations were thought to be neutral, meaning that they had no effect on the fitness of an organism. However, recent research has shown that this is not always the case. In fact, many synonymous mutations can have a negative effect on fitness. This is because synonymous mutations can affect the way in which a gene is expressed. For example, a synonymous mutation can change the structure of a gene transcript, which can make it more difficult for the gene to be translated into a protein. Synonymous mutations can also affect the rate at which a gene is transcribed or translated. The discovery that synonymous mutations can be nonneutral has important implications for the study of evolution. For example, it means that we need to be more careful w
Read more

The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas

Image
“The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis are, if not outright overturned, replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution. So, not to mince words, the Modern Synthesis is gone.” -EV Koonin, cited by over 250,000 scientists. The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas As the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin's epochal "On the Origin of Species" casts a long shadow, evolutionary biologist Eugene V. Koonin throws down a gauntlet in his essay "The Origin at 150: Is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight?" He contends that the Modern Synthesis, the reigning framework since the 1950s, has crumbled under the weight of post-genomic discoveries. This audacious claim compels us to ask: has the ship of evolutionary understanding truly run aground, and if so, can a new v
Read more