Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and epigenetics complicate Common Ancestry

"The classic evidence for universal common ancestry...is largely restricted to local' common ancestry-for example, of specific phyla rather than the entirety of life-and has yet to fully integrate the recent advances from modern phylogenetics and probability theory. Although UCA is widely assumed, it has rarely been subjected to formal quantitative testing." -Nature, 2010


Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and epigenetics can both introduce complexities into common ancestry studies that rely primarily on traditional phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. Here's how:

Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT)

  • Challenges the Tree of Life Model: Traditional phylogenetic studies often assume a vertical inheritance of genetic material from parent to offspring, resulting in a tree-like pattern of evolutionary relationships. HGT, where genes are transferred between unrelated organisms, disrupts this pattern, making it look more like a web or network. This can make it difficult to trace lineages and determine accurate evolutionary relationships.

  • Confounds Phylogenetic Signals: When a gene is acquired through HGT, it can appear to be closely related to genes from a distantly related organism, even though the rest of the recipient organism's genome tells a different story. This can lead to incorrect phylogenetic trees and misinterpretations of evolutionary history.

  • Examples: HGT is particularly common in prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) and has played a significant role in their evolution, such as the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes. It also occurs in eukaryotes, although less frequently, and can contribute to the evolution of new traits.

Epigenetics

  • Inheritance Beyond DNA Sequence: Epigenetics involves heritable changes in gene expression that do not involve alterations to the underlying DNA sequence. These changes can be influenced by environmental factors and can affect phenotypes.

  • Complicates Traditional Phylogenetics: Traditional phylogenetic analysis focuses on DNA sequence changes, but epigenetic modifications can affect how genes are expressed and function, potentially leading to phenotypic differences that are not reflected in the DNA sequence itself. This can complicate the interpretation of evolutionary relationships based solely on DNA data.

  • Potential for Rapid Adaptation: Epigenetic changes can occur more rapidly than DNA sequence mutations, allowing for quicker adaptation to environmental changes. This can blur the lines between inherited and acquired traits, making it more challenging to trace ancestry based on phenotypic characteristics.

How These Factors Affect Common Ancestry Studies

  • Need for Integrative Approaches: To account for HGT and epigenetics, researchers need to use integrative approaches that combine traditional phylogenetic analysis with other methods, such as:

  • Analysis of gene content and synteny (gene order): This can help identify genes acquired through HGT.

  • Examination of epigenetic markers: This can provide insights into heritable changes in gene expression that may not be reflected in DNA sequences.

  • Network-based phylogenetics: This can better represent the complex relationships created by HGT.

  • Re-evaluation of Existing Phylogenies: Some existing phylogenies may need to be re-evaluated in light of HGT and epigenetic effects.

In summary: HGT and epigenetics add layers of complexity to the study of common ancestry. Researchers need to be aware of these factors and use integrative approaches to accurately reconstruct evolutionary histories.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Natural Selection has not been accurately measured since Darwin

Image
Francis Crick's term "frozen accident" falsely described the seeming rigidity of the genetic code, its apparent inability to accommodate additional amino acids beyond the standard 20. This observation had puzzled scientists for decades, as the genetic code seems to have reached a plateau in its expansion despite the potential for incorporating new amino acids with novel properties. NeoDarwinian thinking reasoned greater natural selection could occur with more codons. Several hypotheses were put forward to explain this apparent standstill in the genetic code's evolution. Crick and others  eventually applied natural selection to think redundant codons were neutral as to account for neutral selection . The question of why the genetic code stopped incorporating new amino acids remained a fascinating topic in evolutionary biology till Cas9 Crispr. The redundancy of codons, where multiple codons can specify the same amino acid, has long been considered a neutr
Read more

The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas

Image
“The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis are, if not outright overturned, replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution. So, not to mince words, the Modern Synthesis is gone.” -EV Koonin, cited by over 250,000 scientists. The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas As the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin's epochal "On the Origin of Species" casts a long shadow, evolutionary biologist Eugene V. Koonin throws down a gauntlet in his essay "The Origin at 150: Is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight?" He contends that the Modern Synthesis, the reigning framework since the 1950s, has crumbled under the weight of post-genomic discoveries. This audacious claim compels us to ask: has the ship of evolutionary understanding truly run aground, and if so, can a new v
Read more

Greatest threat to Evolution in 60 years

Image
60 years of evolution studies are threatened by nonneutral synonymous mutations. Synonymous mutations are mutations that change a codon in a gene but do not change the amino acid that is encoded by that codon. For many years, synonymous mutations were thought to be neutral, meaning that they had no effect on the fitness of an organism. However, recent research has shown that this is not always the case. In fact, many synonymous mutations can have a negative effect on fitness. This is because synonymous mutations can affect the way in which a gene is expressed. For example, a synonymous mutation can change the structure of a gene transcript, which can make it more difficult for the gene to be translated into a protein. Synonymous mutations can also affect the rate at which a gene is transcribed or translated. The discovery that synonymous mutations can be nonneutral has important implications for the study of evolution. For example, it means that we need to be more careful w
Read more