Gene duplication of Transcription Factors challenges NeoDarwinism


Neo-Darwinism is the modern synthesis of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection and Mendelian genetics. 

Gene duplication is a natural process in which a section of DNA is copied, resulting in two or more copies of the same gene. This can happen in a variety of ways, including errors during DNA replication, unequal crossing over during meiosis, and transposable elements.

Gene duplication plays an important role in evolution. It can lead to the development of new genes, new gene functions, and increased gene expression. It can also allow genes to be subfunctionalized, where each copy of the gene takes on a different function.

Neo-Darwinism explains the evolution of new genes and gene functions through the process of natural selection. However, gene duplication challenges Neo-Darwinism in a few ways:

  • Gene duplication can lead to the evolution of new genes and gene functions without the need for natural selection. This is because the extra copy of the gene can mutate and evolve independently of the original gene. This can lead to the development of new functions that may not be beneficial to the organism at first. 

  • Gene duplication can lead to the evolution of complex traits that would be difficult to explain by gradualism. For example, the evolution of the eye is a complex process that would require many small changes to occur in a coordinated manner. However, gene duplication can provide the necessary raw material for these changes to occur.

  • Gene duplication can lead to the evolution of new adaptations to new environmental conditions. For example, if a population of animals is suddenly exposed to a new toxin, gene duplication can provide the opportunity for genes to evolve that detoxify the toxin. This can allow the population to survive and adapt to the new environment.

Overall, gene duplication is a powerful evolutionary force that can lead to the evolution of new genes, new gene functions, and complex traits. It challenges Neo-Darwinism by providing a mechanism for the evolution of new adaptations without the need for gradualism and natural selection.

Here are some specific examples of how gene duplication has challenged Neo-Darwinism:

  • The evolution of the immune system. The immune system is a complex system that is able to recognize and destroy a wide variety of pathogens. Gene duplication has played a major role in the evolution of the immune system. For example, the genes that encode antibodies are duplicated many times, which allows the body to produce a wide variety of antibodies that can recognize different pathogens.

  • The evolution of the vertebrate eye. The vertebrate eye is a complex organ that is able to focus light and transmit images to the brain. Gene duplication has played a major role in the evolution of the vertebrate eye. For example, the genes that encode the proteins that make up the lens of the eye are duplicated many times. This allows the lens to be made up of a large number of identical cells, which is necessary for it to focus light properly.

  • The evolution of the human brain. The human brain is the most complex organ in the known universe. Gene duplication has played a major role in the evolution of the human brain. For example, the genes that encode the proteins that make up the synapses between neurons are duplicated many times. This allows the brain to have a large number of synapses, which is necessary for its complexity.

These are just a few examples of how gene duplication has challenged Neo-Darwinism. Gene duplication is a powerful evolutionary force that can lead to the evolution of new genes, new gene functions, and complex traits. It is an important part of our understanding of how life on Earth has evolved.

The article "Updated Phylogeny and Protein Structure Predictions Revise the Hypothesis on the Origin of MADS-box Transcription Factors in Land Plants" by Lee et al. (2023) challenges neo-Darwinism in two ways.

First, it provides evidence that the evolution of MADS-box transcription factors in land plants may have occurred through a series of gene duplication events, rather than through gradual selection on random mutations. This is inconsistent with the neo-Darwinian view of evolution as a gradual process driven by the accumulation of small, adaptive mutations.

Second, the article suggests that the ancestral land plant may have possessed a different set of MADS-box transcription factors than previously thought. This is based on the finding that plant Type I and II MADS-box transcription factors more closely resemble MEF2-type transcription factors in animals than they do SRF-type transcription factors. This suggests that the ancestral land plant lost its SRF-type transcription factors, and that Type I MADS-box transcription factors evolved from MEF2-type transcription factors after the divergence of land plants from other eukaryotes.

Both of these findings are challenging to neo-Darwinism because they suggest that the evolution of complex traits can occur through rapid and large-scale changes in gene content. Neo-Darwinism typically views evolution as a gradual process driven by the accumulation of small, adaptive mutations. However, the evolution of MADS-box transcription factors in land plants appears to have occurred through a series of gene duplication events, which can lead to rapid and large-scale changes in gene content.

In addition, the finding that the ancestral land plant may have possessed a different set of MADS-box transcription factors than previously thought suggests that the evolution of complex traits is not always a gradual process of adding new genes and functions. In some cases, complex traits may evolve through the loss of existing genes and functions.

Overall, the article by Lee et al. (2023) provides evidence that the evolution of MADS-box transcription factors in land plants is more complex than previously thought, and that it may have occurred through mechanisms that are not easily explained by neo-Darwinism.

Here is a more detailed discussion of how the article challenges neo-Darwinism:

Gene duplication

Gene duplication is a common evolutionary mechanism that can lead to the creation of new genes with new functions. Neo-Darwinism typically views gene duplication as a minor mechanism of evolution, and it does not adequately explain how gene duplication can lead to the evolution of complex traits.

However, the evolution of MADS-box transcription factors in land plants appears to have occurred through a series of gene duplication events. For example, the authors of the article found that Type I and II MADS-box transcription factors in land plants originated from a MEF2-type transcription factor through a gene duplication event in the most recent common ancestor of land plants.

This finding suggests that gene duplication can play a major role in the evolution of complex traits. Gene duplication can create new genes that are free to evolve new functions without disrupting the function of the original gene. This can lead to the rapid evolution of new and complex traits.

Loss of function

Neo-Darwinism typically views evolution as a process of adding new genes and functions. However, the finding that the ancestral land plant may have possessed a different set of MADS-box transcription factors than previously thought suggests that the evolution of complex traits is not always a gradual process of adding new genes and functions. In some cases, complex traits may evolve through the loss of existing genes and functions.

For example, the authors of the article hypothesize that the ancestral land plant lost its SRF-type transcription factors, and that Type I MADS-box transcription factors evolved from MEF2-type transcription factors after the divergence of land plants from other eukaryotes.

This finding suggests that the loss of existing genes and functions can also play a role in the evolution of complex traits. The loss of a gene can lead to the emergence of new phenotypes, and it can also create new opportunities for other genes to evolve new functions.

Overall, the article by Lee et al. (2023) provides evidence that the evolution of MADS-box transcription factors in land plants is more complex than previously thought, and that it may have occurred through mechanisms that are not easily explained by neo-Darwinism. The authors' findings suggest that gene duplication and loss of function can play major roles in the evolution of complex traits, and that evolution is not always a gradual process of adding new genes and functions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Natural Selection has not been accurately measured since Darwin

Image
Francis Crick's term "frozen accident" falsely described the seeming rigidity of the genetic code, its apparent inability to accommodate additional amino acids beyond the standard 20. This observation had puzzled scientists for decades, as the genetic code seems to have reached a plateau in its expansion despite the potential for incorporating new amino acids with novel properties. NeoDarwinian thinking reasoned greater natural selection could occur with more codons. Several hypotheses were put forward to explain this apparent standstill in the genetic code's evolution. Crick and others  eventually applied natural selection to think redundant codons were neutral as to account for neutral selection . The question of why the genetic code stopped incorporating new amino acids remained a fascinating topic in evolutionary biology till Cas9 Crispr. The redundancy of codons, where multiple codons can specify the same amino acid, has long been considered a neutr
Read more

Greatest threat to Evolution in 60 years

Image
60 years of evolution studies are threatened by nonneutral synonymous mutations. Synonymous mutations are mutations that change a codon in a gene but do not change the amino acid that is encoded by that codon. For many years, synonymous mutations were thought to be neutral, meaning that they had no effect on the fitness of an organism. However, recent research has shown that this is not always the case. In fact, many synonymous mutations can have a negative effect on fitness. This is because synonymous mutations can affect the way in which a gene is expressed. For example, a synonymous mutation can change the structure of a gene transcript, which can make it more difficult for the gene to be translated into a protein. Synonymous mutations can also affect the rate at which a gene is transcribed or translated. The discovery that synonymous mutations can be nonneutral has important implications for the study of evolution. For example, it means that we need to be more careful w
Read more

The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas

Image
“The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis are, if not outright overturned, replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution. So, not to mince words, the Modern Synthesis is gone.” -EV Koonin, cited by over 250,000 scientists. The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas As the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin's epochal "On the Origin of Species" casts a long shadow, evolutionary biologist Eugene V. Koonin throws down a gauntlet in his essay "The Origin at 150: Is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight?" He contends that the Modern Synthesis, the reigning framework since the 1950s, has crumbled under the weight of post-genomic discoveries. This audacious claim compels us to ask: has the ship of evolutionary understanding truly run aground, and if so, can a new v
Read more