Homoplasty Challenges NeoDarwinian Homology

-


Homology is the relationship between two or more structures that share a common evolutionary origin. Neo-Darwinian homology is based on the idea that homologous structures are derived from a common ancestor through natural selection.

Homoplasy is the similarity between two or more structures that do not share a common evolutionary origin. Homoplasy can be caused by a variety of factors, including convergent evolution, parallel evolution, and mimicry.

Homoplasy challenges Neo-Darwinian homology in a number of ways. First, it shows that homologous structures are not necessarily the result of natural selection. Second, it shows that similar structures can arise from different evolutionary origins. Third, it can make it difficult to determine the evolutionary relationships between different groups of organisms.

Here are 10 specific ways in which homoplasy challenges Neo-Darwinian homology:

  1. Convergent evolution: Convergent evolution is the process by which different groups of organisms independently evolve similar traits in response to similar environmental pressures. This can lead to homoplasy, as the similar traits in the different groups of organisms are not homologous. For example, the wings of birds and bats are not homologous, as they arose independently through convergent evolution.

  2. Parallel evolution: Parallel evolution is the process by which closely related groups of organisms independently evolve similar traits. This can also lead to homoplasy, as the similar traits in the different groups of organisms are not homologous. For example, the marsupials of Australia and the placental mammals of other continents have independently evolved many similar traits, such as opposable thumbs and pouches.

  3. Mimicry: Mimicry is a type of convergent evolution in which one organism evolves to resemble another organism in order to gain some advantage, such as protection from predators. This can also lead to homoplasy, as the similar traits in the two organisms are not homologous. For example, the viceroy butterfly mimics the monarch butterfly in order to avoid being eaten by predators.

  4. Pseudogenes: Pseudogenes are genes that have become non-functional. They can be created by mutations or by gene duplication. Pseudogenes can be homoplasous, as they may arise independently in different groups of organisms. For example, there are pseudogenes for the hemoglobin gene in both humans and chimpanzees.

  5. Horizontal gene transfer: Horizontal gene transfer is the transfer of genes between organisms that are not parent and offspring. This can lead to homoplasy, as the same gene can be present in different groups of organisms that are not closely related. For example, some bacteria have acquired genes from archaea, which are a different domain of life.

  6. Reversals: Reversals are the loss of a trait that was present in an ancestor. This can lead to homoplasy, as the same trait can be lost independently in different groups of organisms. For example, the wings of flightless birds have been lost independently in several different groups of birds.

  7. Vestigial organs: Vestigial organs are remnants of organs that were once functional in an ancestor. They can be homoplasous, as the same vestigial organ can be present in different groups of organisms that are not closely related. For example, the whale has a vestigial pelvis, which is a remnant of the pelvis that was present in its terrestrial ancestors.

  8. Atavisms: Atavisms are traits that reappear in an individual after having been lost for many generations. They can be homoplasous, as the same atavistic trait can reappear in different groups of organisms that are not closely related. For example, there have been cases of humans being born with tails.

  9. Mutations: Mutations can also lead to homoplasy, as the same mutation can occur independently in different groups of organisms. For example, the same mutation in the hemoglobin gene can cause sickle cell anemia in both humans and gorillas.

  10. Chance: Finally, chance can also lead to homoplasy. For example, if two different groups of organisms have the same small number of possible traits, then it is more likely that they will evolve the same trait by chance.

These are just a few of the ways in which homoplasy challenges Neo-Darwinian homology. Homoplasy is a complex phenomenon, and it is still not fully understood. However, it is clear that homoplasy plays an important role in evolution, and that it must be taken into account when interpreting the fossil record and when constructing phylogenetic trees.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, the EES is not just a add on to Neo-Darwinism aka the Modern Synthesis

-
Image
" The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis fthe theory of evolution) are, if not outright overturned replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution (EES). So, not to mince words , the Modern Synthesis is gone" -Eugene Koonin, an evolutionary biologist (Cited by over 270,000 evolutionary scientists.) The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) represents a significant departure from the traditional neo-Darwinian framework, also known as the Modern Synthesis . While both theories aim to explain evolutionary change, they differ fundamentally in their underlying mechanisms and the roles they assign to various biological processes. A crucial point of divergence lies in the interpretation and application of the term " evolutionary ," particularly concerning the incorporation of epigenetic mechanisms....
Read more

Is the random mutational model of evolution on its way out?

-
Image
While the random mutational model of evolution has long been a cornerstone of evolutionary biology, the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) and the study of epigenetics are challenging its core assumptions. The Random Mutational Model and Its Limitations The traditional view of evolution, often called the Modern Synthesis or neo-Darwinism , emphasizes random genetic mutations as the primary source of variation. Natural selection then acts upon this variation, favoring individuals with advantageous traits. This model has been successful in explaining some evolutionary phenomena, but it also has limitations: It struggles to explain complex adaptations: The idea that complex features like the eye or the immune system arose solely through random mutations seems statistically improbable. It overlooks the role of the environment: The traditional model treats the environment as a selective force, but it doesn't fully consider how organisms can actively respond to and s...
Read more

ERVs and Common Descent: A Reassessment in Light of Recent Findings

-
Image
Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have long been considered strong evidence for the common descent of humans and chimpanzees. These remnants of ancient viral infections, embedded in the genomes of both species, were once thought to be non-functional "junk DNA." The premise was that the shared presence of these seemingly random insertions in corresponding genomic locations could best be explained by a shared evolutionary history. However, recent research, such as the "Switching Sides" article published in May 2021, has challenged this assumption by demonstrating that ERVs play a functional role in the development of the human embryo and immune system. This discovery raises questions about the validity of using ERVs as primary evidence for common descent. The Traditional Argument for Common Descent The traditional argument for common descent based on ERVs rests on the following points: Random Insertion: Retroviral insertions are thought to occur randomly in...
Read more