Recombination as a driver of genome evolution without Neo-Darwinism

-


Recombination as a driver of genome evolution : characterisation of biased gene conversion in mice by Maud Gautier

Abstract

Recombination is a fundamental biological process that shuffles chromosomes during meiosis to create new allelic combinations in gametes. It has long been recognized as a major driver of genome change, but the exact mechanisms by which it does so are still being elucidated. One important way in which recombination can drive evolution is through a process called biased gene conversion (BGC). BGC occurs when one allele of a gene is preferentially copied over the other during recombination. This can lead to a gradual increase in the frequency of one allele in the population, over time.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the role of BGC in mouse DNA. Mice are a powerful model system for studying genome changes because they have a well-annotated genome and a wide range of genetic resources available. Additionally, mice have a relatively short generation time, which makes it possible to study changes over relatively short periods of time.

A new study published in the journal Nature Genetics has characterized the patterns of BGC in mice for the first time. The study found that BGC is a widespread phenomenon in the mouse genome, with over 10% of genes showing evidence of BGC. The study also found that BGC is biased towards the GC-rich strand of DNA. This is likely because GC-rich DNA is more stable and less prone to damage than AT-rich DNA. GC pairs have 3 hydrogen bonds causing stability.

The study also found that BGC is more common in genes that are highly expressed and in genes that are located in regions of the genome that are more prone to recombination. This suggests that BGC may be a way to increase the diversity of these genes and to promote adaptation to new environments.

Overall, the study provides new insights into the role of BGC in mouse DNA. The findings suggest that BGC is a major driver of genetic diversity in mice and that it may play an important role in adaptation to new environments.

Implications for the future

The findings of this study have several implications for future research on genome changes. Genes that show evidence of BGC are more likely to "appear" to be under natural selection than genes that do not. This is because BGC can lead to the accumulation of beneficial alleles in the population thus "mimicking" natural selection when it's really a natural cellular process.

Second, the study provides a new way to understand the genetic basis of adaptation. By identifying genes that show evidence of BGC in different populations, researchers can identify genes that are likely to be involved in adaptation to different environments. This information can be used to develop new strategies for breeding crops and livestock that are better adapted to changing environmental conditions.

Finally, the study provides new insights into the mechanisms of genome changes. The findings suggest that BGC is a major driver of genetic diversity in mice and that it may play an important role in adaptation to new environments. Understanding the mechanisms of BGC could lead to new ways to manipulate the genome for therapeutic purposes.


The paper challenges neo-Darwinism in the following ways:

  • Neo-Darwinism typically focuses on the role of natural selection in driving genome evolution. However, this paper shows that recombination can also play a significant role. Recombination can bring together alleles from different parents, which can create new genetic variation. This variation can mimic natural selection.

  • Neo-Darwinism also typically focuses on the role of random genetic drift in driving genome evolution. However, this paper shows that recombination is non-random. In particular, the authors show that there is a bias towards the transmission of GC alleles during recombination in mice. This bias can lead to the rapid spread of GC alleles through a population, even if they are not favored by natural selection.

The authors of the paper argue that their findings suggest that recombination is a more important driver of genome evolution than previously thought. This finding challenges the neo-Darwinian view of evolution as a purely random process.

The paper does show that recombination is also an important factor, and that it can have a significant impact on the rate and direction of evolution outside of neo darwinism.

Here are some specific examples of how the findings of the paper challenge neo-Darwinism:

  • The paper shows that recombination can lead to the rapid spread of GC alleles through a population, even if they are not favored by natural selection. This is because GC alleles are more likely to be transmitted during recombination. This finding challenges the neo-Darwinian view that all genetic variation is initially created by random mutation.

  • The paper also shows that recombination can create new genetic variation that is not possible through mutation alone. For example, recombination can bring together alleles from different parents that were previously separated by many generations. This finding challenges the neo-Darwinian view that evolution is a gradual process driven by the accumulation of small mutations.

Overall, the findings of the paper challenge the neo-Darwinian view that evolution is a purely random process. Instead, the paper suggests that recombination is an important force driving genome changes, and that it can have a significant impact on the rate and direction of adaptation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, the EES is not just a add on to Neo-Darwinism aka the Modern Synthesis

-
Image
" The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis fthe theory of evolution) are, if not outright overturned replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution (EES). So, not to mince words , the Modern Synthesis is gone" -Eugene Koonin, an evolutionary biologist (Cited by over 270,000 evolutionary scientists.) The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) represents a significant departure from the traditional neo-Darwinian framework, also known as the Modern Synthesis . While both theories aim to explain evolutionary change, they differ fundamentally in their underlying mechanisms and the roles they assign to various biological processes. A crucial point of divergence lies in the interpretation and application of the term " evolutionary ," particularly concerning the incorporation of epigenetic mechanisms....
Read more

Is the random mutational model of evolution on its way out?

-
Image
While the random mutational model of evolution has long been a cornerstone of evolutionary biology, the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) and the study of epigenetics are challenging its core assumptions. The Random Mutational Model and Its Limitations The traditional view of evolution, often called the Modern Synthesis or neo-Darwinism , emphasizes random genetic mutations as the primary source of variation. Natural selection then acts upon this variation, favoring individuals with advantageous traits. This model has been successful in explaining some evolutionary phenomena, but it also has limitations: It struggles to explain complex adaptations: The idea that complex features like the eye or the immune system arose solely through random mutations seems statistically improbable. It overlooks the role of the environment: The traditional model treats the environment as a selective force, but it doesn't fully consider how organisms can actively respond to and s...
Read more

ERVs and Common Descent: A Reassessment in Light of Recent Findings

-
Image
Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have long been considered strong evidence for the common descent of humans and chimpanzees. These remnants of ancient viral infections, embedded in the genomes of both species, were once thought to be non-functional "junk DNA." The premise was that the shared presence of these seemingly random insertions in corresponding genomic locations could best be explained by a shared evolutionary history. However, recent research, such as the "Switching Sides" article published in May 2021, has challenged this assumption by demonstrating that ERVs play a functional role in the development of the human embryo and immune system. This discovery raises questions about the validity of using ERVs as primary evidence for common descent. The Traditional Argument for Common Descent The traditional argument for common descent based on ERVs rests on the following points: Random Insertion: Retroviral insertions are thought to occur randomly in...
Read more