HGT Antibiotic Resistance- too fast for Neo-Darwinism

Article: Clinically Relevant Antibiotic Resistance Genes Are Linked to a Limited Set of Taxa Within Gut Microbiome Worldwide, (11/23)

The global spread of antibiotic resistance (AR) poses a significant threat to human health, as it renders important pathogens increasingly unresponsive to traditional antibiotic therapies. The human gut microbiome, a complex and diverse ecosystem of microorganisms, is considered a major reservoir of AR genes, and the potential for these genes to transfer to pathogens is a growing concern. However, despite the abundance of AR genes in the gut microbiome, our understanding of their taxonomic associations and transfer potential across diverse microbial taxa remains limited.

A recent study published in Nature Communications addressed this gap in knowledge by examining the global prevalence and taxonomic range of clinically relevant AR genes within the gut microbiome. The researchers analyzed a vast collection of metagenomic and isolate genome data, encompassing over 14,800 human gut microbiome samples, 1666 environmental metagenomes, and nearly 600,000 isolate genomes from 33 countries. Their findings revealed that several of the most concerning AR genes, including those encoding the cephalosporinase CTX-M and carbapenemases KPC, IMP, NDM, and VIM, remain taxonomically restricted to the phylum Proteobacteria. Even cfiA, the most common carbapenemase gene within the human gut microbiome, is tightly restricted to the genus Bacteroides, despite being found on a mobilizable plasmid.

To further validate these findings, the researchers employed a high-sensitivity single-cell fusion PCR approach to analyze gut microbiome samples from India, Honduras, Pakistan, and Vietnam. The results confirmed the limited taxonomic distribution of clinically relevant AR genes, demonstrating that these genes are not yet widely disseminated across diverse commensal gut microbiota.

The study's findings have significant implications for our understanding of AR dynamics within the gut microbiome. They suggest that the spread of clinically relevant AR genes is not as widespread as previously thought, and that these genes remain largely confined to a specific subset of taxa. This suggests that targeting specific taxa or AR genes may provide more effective strategies for controlling AR in the gut microbiome.

The study also raises important questions about the factors limiting the spread of clinically relevant AR genes across diverse gut microbiota. The researchers found that few mutations are required for carbapenemase and cephalosporinase genes, thus far restricted to Bacteroides species, to become effective in a different phylum. This suggests that barriers to AR gene transfer may not simply be due to sequence incompatibility. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the limited taxonomic distribution of clinically relevant AR genes within the gut microbiome.

Overall, the study provides valuable insights into the taxonomic distribution and transfer potential of clinically relevant AR genes within the gut microbiome, offering a more nuanced understanding of AR dynamics in this complex ecosystem. These findings have implications for the development of targeted strategies to control AR in the gut microbiome and mitigate the global threat of antibiotic resistance.

---

The implications of the article challenges neo-Darwinism in several ways.

1. It suggests that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is a major force in the evolution of antibiotic resistance.

Neo-Darwinism is primarily based on the idea of vertical gene transfer, in which genes are passed down from parents to offspring. However, HGT is a process in which genes can be transferred between unrelated organisms. This can lead to the rapid spread of antibiotic resistance genes, as they can be quickly acquired by bacteria that were previously susceptible to antibiotics.

The article found that several clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes are found in a few isolated taxa, suggesting that HGT may have played a major role in their spread. This is in contrast to the neo-Darwinian view, which would predict that antibiotic resistance genes would have arisen multiple times independently in different lineages.

2. It suggests that the evolution of antibiotic resistance is not simply a matter of natural selection.

Neo-Darwinism suggests that antibiotic resistance is the result of natural selection, in which bacteria with mutations that make them resistant to antibiotics are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, the article found that many antibiotic resistance genes are found on plasmids, which are extrachromosomal pieces of DNA that can be easily transferred between bacteria. This suggests that the spread of antibiotic resistance is not just a matter of natural selection, but is also influenced by horizontal gene transfer.

3. It suggests that the human gut microbiome is a major reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes.

The article found that many clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes are found in the human gut microbiome. This suggests that the gut microbiome is a major source of antibiotic resistance genes, and that it may play a role in the spread of antibiotic resistance to other bacteria.

Overall, the article suggests that neo-Darwinism may not be sufficient to explain the evolution of antibiotic resistance. It suggests that HGT and the human gut microbiome play important roles in the spread of antibiotic resistance genes. These findings have implications for the development of new strategies to combat antibiotic resistance.