Pericentromeric Satellite DNA- no longer Neo-Darwinian Junk DNA

-


Article: “A Conserved Function for Pericentromeric Satellite DNA”


Abstract

Pericentromeric satellite DNA is a highly repetitive, non-coding DNA sequence that flanks the centromeres of many eukaryotic chromosomes. It has long been considered to be junk DNA, with no known function. However, recent studies have suggested that pericentromeric satellite DNA may play an important role in chromosome organization and stability.

Introduction

Pericentromeric satellite DNA is found in a wide variety of eukaryotes, from yeast to humans. It is typically composed of tandem repeats of short DNA sequences, often with a high AT content. These repeats are thought to arise from unequal crossing over between sister chromatids.

Pericentromeric satellite DNA has been implicated in a number of functions, including:

  • Chromosome organization: Pericentromeric satellite DNA helps to organize chromosomes into a compact structure within the nucleus.

  • Chromosome stability: Pericentromeric satellite DNA protects chromosomes from damage and instability.

  • Gene regulation: Pericentromeric satellite DNA regulates the expression of nearby genes.

New Evidence for a Conserved Function

The study by Madhav Jagannathan and Ryan Cummings provides further evidence for a conserved function of pericentromeric satellite DNA. The authors show that pericentromeric satellite DNA is required for the formation of chromocenters, which are clusters of pericentromeric heterochromatin. Chromocenters are thought to play an important role in maintaining the integrity of the genome.

The authors also show that the disruption of chromocenters leads to a number of cellular defects, including:

  • Micronuclei formation: Micronuclei are small, fragmented chromosomes that can form when chromosomes missegregate during cell division.

  • DNA damage: Micronuclei are more susceptible to DNA damage than intact chromosomes.

  • Cell death: Cells that contain micronuclei are more likely to die than cells that do not contain micronuclei.

These findings suggest that pericentromeric satellite DNA plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity of the genome and preventing cellular damage.

Discussion

The findings of Jagannathan et al. challenge the traditional neo darwinian view of pericentromeric satellite DNA as junk DNA. Their study suggests that pericentromeric satellite DNA is an important component of chromosomes and that it plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity of the genome. These findings have important implications for our understanding of eukaryotic cell biology.

Five Ways the Study Challenges Neo-Darwinism

  1. The study provides evidence for a function of pericentromeric satellite DNA, which is a type of DNA that is not directly involved in coding for proteins. This suggests that not all DNA is junk DNA, as is often claimed by Neo-Darwinists.

  2. The study shows that pericentromeric satellite DNA is required for the proper maintenance of the genome. This suggests that pericentromeric satellite DNA is an important part of the eukaryotic cell and that it plays a critical role in ensuring the survival of organisms.

  3. The study provides evidence for the existence of chromocenters, which are structures that are thought to play a role in a number of important cellular processes. Chromocenters are not predicted by Neo-Darwinism, so their existence challenges the theory.

  4. The study shows that chromocenters are formed by the clustering of pericentromeric heterochromatin, which is a type of DNA that is rich in repetitive sequences. Repetitive sequences are often considered to be junk DNA by Neo-Darwinists, so their presence in chromocenters challenges the theory.

  5. The study shows that chromocenters are important for maintaining the integrity of the genome. This suggests that chromocenters are an important part of the eukaryotic cell and that they play a critical role in ensuring the survival of organisms.

Conclusion

The study by Jagannathan et al. is a significant advance in our understanding of the function of pericentromeric satellite DNA. The study shows that pericentromeric satellite DNA is not Junk DNA as once thought rather it is an important component of chromosomes and that it plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity of the genome. These findings have important implications for our understanding of eukaryotic cell biology. 

It also suggests neo-Darwinism needs revision if not replacement.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, the EES is not just a add on to Neo-Darwinism aka the Modern Synthesis

-
Image
" The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis fthe theory of evolution) are, if not outright overturned replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution (EES). So, not to mince words , the Modern Synthesis is gone" -Eugene Koonin, an evolutionary biologist (Cited by over 270,000 evolutionary scientists.) The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) represents a significant departure from the traditional neo-Darwinian framework, also known as the Modern Synthesis . While both theories aim to explain evolutionary change, they differ fundamentally in their underlying mechanisms and the roles they assign to various biological processes. A crucial point of divergence lies in the interpretation and application of the term " evolutionary ," particularly concerning the incorporation of epigenetic mechanisms....
Read more

Is the random mutational model of evolution on its way out?

-
Image
While the random mutational model of evolution has long been a cornerstone of evolutionary biology, the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) and the study of epigenetics are challenging its core assumptions. The Random Mutational Model and Its Limitations The traditional view of evolution, often called the Modern Synthesis or neo-Darwinism , emphasizes random genetic mutations as the primary source of variation. Natural selection then acts upon this variation, favoring individuals with advantageous traits. This model has been successful in explaining some evolutionary phenomena, but it also has limitations: It struggles to explain complex adaptations: The idea that complex features like the eye or the immune system arose solely through random mutations seems statistically improbable. It overlooks the role of the environment: The traditional model treats the environment as a selective force, but it doesn't fully consider how organisms can actively respond to and s...
Read more

ERVs and Common Descent: A Reassessment in Light of Recent Findings

-
Image
Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have long been considered strong evidence for the common descent of humans and chimpanzees. These remnants of ancient viral infections, embedded in the genomes of both species, were once thought to be non-functional "junk DNA." The premise was that the shared presence of these seemingly random insertions in corresponding genomic locations could best be explained by a shared evolutionary history. However, recent research, such as the "Switching Sides" article published in May 2021, has challenged this assumption by demonstrating that ERVs play a functional role in the development of the human embryo and immune system. This discovery raises questions about the validity of using ERVs as primary evidence for common descent. The Traditional Argument for Common Descent The traditional argument for common descent based on ERVs rests on the following points: Random Insertion: Retroviral insertions are thought to occur randomly in...
Read more