Bending the Central Dogma: New Discoveries Reshaping Our Understanding of Genes and Information Flow



Bending the Central Dogma: New Discoveries Reshaping Our Understanding of Genes and Information Flow

The Central Dogma, proposed by Francis Crick in 1958, has long been the cornerstone of our understanding of how genetic information flows. It dictates a seemingly straightforward one-way street: DNA → RNA → protein. This elegant paradigm laid the foundation for evolution, revolutionizing our understanding of life and disease. But like any good map, it's important to periodically check for hidden shortcuts and uncharted territories. And that's precisely what recent discoveries are doing, revealing fascinating detours and bypasses that complicate, and ultimately challenging the Central Dogma.

1. gBGC and the Shadow Code:

Imagine a hidden inscription tucked beneath the official text on a document. That's what gBGC (Guanine-cytosine bias in gene composition) is like. This phenomenon refers to the non-random non darwinian distribution of G and C nucleotides within coding regions, seemingly defying the randomness expected from pure chance. Researchers believe gBGC might be a second layer of genetic information superimposed on the DNA sequence, influencing codon bias and potentially impacting protein folding and function.

While the nature of this "shadow code" remains enigmatic, its implications are intriguing. Could gBGC be another level of regulatory control, fine-tuning protein expression and adding another layer of complexity to the genetic landscape? The investigation continues, promising exciting developments in our understanding of the intricate language of DNA.

2. Horizontal Gene Transfer: Junk DNA Gets a Hitchhike:

Remember all that "junk DNA" we used to dismiss as evolutionary leftovers? Turns out it hitches a ride on a fascinating, if unconventional, mode of transport: horizontal gene transfer (HGT). This process allows organisms to acquire genetic material not from their parents, but directly from other individuals, even across different species!


Imagine a bacterium picking up a gene for antibiotic resistance from its neighbor. Suddenly, it's armed against a previously lethal threat, highlighting the dynamic and collaborative nature of evolution. HGT challenges the traditional vertical inheritance model, blurring the lines between species and forcing us to rethink the concept of a distinct organismal genome. It's a game-changer, rewriting the narrative of genetic inheritance and demonstrating the interconnectedness of life at the molecular level.

3. Epigenetics: Beyond the Blueprint:

The Central Dogma portrays DNA as a static blueprint, dictating protein production. But life rarely plays by simple rules. Enter epigenetics, the study of heritable changes in gene expression that don't involve alterations in the DNA sequence itself as per neo darwinism. Chemical modifications to DNA or its associated proteins, like methylation or acetylation, can act as dimmer switches, turning genes on or off without changing the underlying code.


This layer of control adds incredible flexibility to the genetic program. Imagine two individuals with identical DNA yet displaying vastly different traits. Epigenetics provides a plausible explanation, revealing how environmental factors, lifestyle choices, and even experiences can leave lasting impressions on our gene expression, shaping not just who we are, but also who we become.

Ants with same genotype but different phenotypes

4. Prion Inheritance: Shaping the Fold Across Generations:

Proteins are not static molecules; they fold into intricate shapes that dictate their function. Traditionally, these shapes were thought to be solely determined by the amino acid sequence encoded in the DNA. But prion protein particles, challenge this notion. They can adopt alternative conformations that propagate like templates, influencing the folding of other proteins even in subsequent generations, without any changes in the underlying DNA sequence.

A recent study published in the journal Cell demonstrated that a specific prion named [ESI+], formed by the protein Snt1, can establish and maintain an "activated chromatin state" in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This activated state makes genes in specific regions of the genome more accessible for transcription, leading to their increased expression. This state can be inherited for 100’s of generations.


This "protein inheritance" adds another challenge to the Central Dogma, demonstrating how information can be transmitted not just through DNA, but also through the very shapes of proteins themselves.

5. Non-Coding RNA: The Silent Majority Takes the Stage:

For decades, most of the DNA was labeled "junk" because it didn't seem to code for proteins. But this "dark matter" of the genome is no longer silent. The central dogma assumes most genes code for proteins. Yet, ncRNAs make up a vast majority of the transcribed genome, and many have crucial functions independent of protein production.

This challenges  the central dogma beyond protein sequences. Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) molecules, once considered mere byproducts, are emerging as powerful regulators of gene expression. From microRNAs silencing specific genes to long non-coding RNAs orchestrating complex cellular processes, ncRNAs are rewriting the script of genetic control. 

While ncRNAs themselves don't follow the protein-coding step, they can significantly impact its outcomes. By regulating protein production, they influence the downstream effects of the central dogma. Overall, ncRNAs add a complex layer of regulation challenging the central dogma. They demonstrate that genetic information flows through intricate networks, not just a linear sequence.

Challenging the Central Dogma: New Discoveries Rewriting the Rules of Genetics

For decades, the central dogma of biology reigned supreme, dictating the flow of genetic information: DNA gets transcribed into RNA, which then gets translated into protein. This one-way street seemed absolute, with DNA holding the master blueprint for life. However, recent discoveries are chipping away at this dogma, revealing fascinating new pathways and challenging our understanding of evolution.

gBGC , HGT, Epigenetics, Prions, and Noncoding RNA, collectively, paint a far richer and more dynamic picture of genetic information and evolution. They challenge the one-way street of the central dogma, revealing a web of interconnected pathways, hidden codes, and alternative inheritance mechanisms. These findings necessitate a broader perspective, rethinking neo darwinism to incorporate these new players and their intricate dances.

So, the next time you think about your genes, remember, it's not just about the blueprint. It's about the hidden codes, the unexpected leaps, the epigenetic switches, the protein whispers, and the silent orchestra within. It's a story far grander and more captivating than neo-Darwinism ever imagined.

Ref:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0079610722000347

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-021-09405-3

https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/37/4/1011/2410406

https://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/pdf/S1097-2765(22)01213-8.pdf

Google Scholar

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Natural Selection has not been accurately measured since Darwin

Image
Francis Crick's term "frozen accident" falsely described the seeming rigidity of the genetic code, its apparent inability to accommodate additional amino acids beyond the standard 20. This observation had puzzled scientists for decades, as the genetic code seems to have reached a plateau in its expansion despite the potential for incorporating new amino acids with novel properties. NeoDarwinian thinking reasoned greater natural selection could occur with more codons. Several hypotheses were put forward to explain this apparent standstill in the genetic code's evolution. Crick and others  eventually applied natural selection to think redundant codons were neutral as to account for neutral selection . The question of why the genetic code stopped incorporating new amino acids remained a fascinating topic in evolutionary biology till Cas9 Crispr. The redundancy of codons, where multiple codons can specify the same amino acid, has long been considered a neutr
Read more

Greatest threat to Evolution in 60 years

Image
60 years of evolution studies are threatened by nonneutral synonymous mutations. Synonymous mutations are mutations that change a codon in a gene but do not change the amino acid that is encoded by that codon. For many years, synonymous mutations were thought to be neutral, meaning that they had no effect on the fitness of an organism. However, recent research has shown that this is not always the case. In fact, many synonymous mutations can have a negative effect on fitness. This is because synonymous mutations can affect the way in which a gene is expressed. For example, a synonymous mutation can change the structure of a gene transcript, which can make it more difficult for the gene to be translated into a protein. Synonymous mutations can also affect the rate at which a gene is transcribed or translated. The discovery that synonymous mutations can be nonneutral has important implications for the study of evolution. For example, it means that we need to be more careful w
Read more

The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas

Image
“The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis are, if not outright overturned, replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution. So, not to mince words, the Modern Synthesis is gone.” -EV Koonin, cited by over 250,000 scientists. The Origin at 150: Charting a New Evolutionary Voyage on Post-Genomic Seas As the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin's epochal "On the Origin of Species" casts a long shadow, evolutionary biologist Eugene V. Koonin throws down a gauntlet in his essay "The Origin at 150: Is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight?" He contends that the Modern Synthesis, the reigning framework since the 1950s, has crumbled under the weight of post-genomic discoveries. This audacious claim compels us to ask: has the ship of evolutionary understanding truly run aground, and if so, can a new v
Read more