MicroRNA acts outside of Neo-Darwinism

-


miRNA research presents some complexities and nuances that challenge the traditional understanding of evolution (neo darwinism) based solely on random mutations and natural selection. 

Here are 10 ways microRNA can be seen as challenging Neo-Darwinism:

1. Functional non-coding DNA: The existence and regulatory function of miRNA disprove the notion of "Junk DNA" as purely neutral or meaningless in evolution. Non-coding DNA actively shapes phenotypes, making the concept of evolution solely driven by coding mutations incomplete.

2. Fine-tuning gene expression: miRNA can subtly modulate gene expression, adding an extra layer of control beyond simple "on/off" switches. This suggests a more intricate and dynamic evolutionary landscape than Neo-Darwinism's focus on major mutations.

3. Environmental response and adaptation: miRNA expression can be influenced by environmental factors, allowing organisms to adjust their phenotypes rapidly without relying on slow genetic changes. This challenges the idea of evolution as purely a generational process.

4. Cross-species conservation of regulatory elements: Some miRNA genes are highly conserved across diverse species, even those with little phenotypic similarity. This suggests a deeper layer of functional significance beyond random chance mutations and selection.

5. Horizontal gene transfer and rapid evolution: miRNA can be transferred horizontally between organisms, potentially accelerating the spread of adaptive traits and challenging Neo-Darwinism's focus on vertical inheritance and gradual accumulation of mutations.

6. Epigenetic inheritance and non-genetic variation: miRNA expression can be influenced by epigenetic marks, which can be inherited but not directly encoded in DNA. This introduces a non-genetic component to evolution, further blurring the lines of Neo-Darwinism's focus on genetic change.

7. Complex regulatory networks and feedback loops: miRNA interacts with other regulatory elements in intricate networks, creating feedback loops and non-linear relationships between genes and phenotypes. This challenges the simplicity of Neo-Darwinism's linear model of mutation-selection-adaptation.

8. Developmental plasticity and phenotypic diversity: miRNA plays a crucial role in development, influencing cell differentiation and tissue formation. This highlights the importance of developmental processes in shaping phenotypic diversity, which Neo-Darwinism often overlooks.

9. Emergent properties and non-reductionism: The complex interplay of miRNA with other factors can give rise to emergent properties not predictable from individual components. This challenges Neo-Darwinism's emphasis on reducing phenotypes to underlying genetic causes.

10. Evolving regulatory landscapes and punctuated equilibrium: miRNA evolution can alter the landscape of gene regulation, potentially leading to punctuated bursts of phenotypic change rather than gradual, incremental adaptations. This suggests a more dynamic and punctuated model of evolution than Neo-Darwinism traditionally proposes.

These are challenges to the traditional Neo-Darwinian framework. miRNA research encourages a broader and more nuanced understanding of evolution, where genetic change, regulatory networks, environmental interactions, and developmental processes all play intricate roles in shaping the incredible diversity of life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, the EES is not just a add on to Neo-Darwinism aka the Modern Synthesis

-
Image
" The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis fthe theory of evolution) are, if not outright overturned replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution (EES). So, not to mince words , the Modern Synthesis is gone" -Eugene Koonin, an evolutionary biologist (Cited by over 270,000 evolutionary scientists.) The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) represents a significant departure from the traditional neo-Darwinian framework, also known as the Modern Synthesis . While both theories aim to explain evolutionary change, they differ fundamentally in their underlying mechanisms and the roles they assign to various biological processes. A crucial point of divergence lies in the interpretation and application of the term " evolutionary ," particularly concerning the incorporation of epigenetic mechanisms....
Read more

Is the random mutational model of evolution on its way out?

-
Image
While the random mutational model of evolution has long been a cornerstone of evolutionary biology, the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) and the study of epigenetics are challenging its core assumptions. The Random Mutational Model and Its Limitations The traditional view of evolution, often called the Modern Synthesis or neo-Darwinism , emphasizes random genetic mutations as the primary source of variation. Natural selection then acts upon this variation, favoring individuals with advantageous traits. This model has been successful in explaining some evolutionary phenomena, but it also has limitations: It struggles to explain complex adaptations: The idea that complex features like the eye or the immune system arose solely through random mutations seems statistically improbable. It overlooks the role of the environment: The traditional model treats the environment as a selective force, but it doesn't fully consider how organisms can actively respond to and s...
Read more

ERVs and Common Descent: A Reassessment in Light of Recent Findings

-
Image
Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have long been considered strong evidence for the common descent of humans and chimpanzees. These remnants of ancient viral infections, embedded in the genomes of both species, were once thought to be non-functional "junk DNA." The premise was that the shared presence of these seemingly random insertions in corresponding genomic locations could best be explained by a shared evolutionary history. However, recent research, such as the "Switching Sides" article published in May 2021, has challenged this assumption by demonstrating that ERVs play a functional role in the development of the human embryo and immune system. This discovery raises questions about the validity of using ERVs as primary evidence for common descent. The Traditional Argument for Common Descent The traditional argument for common descent based on ERVs rests on the following points: Random Insertion: Retroviral insertions are thought to occur randomly in...
Read more