Small RNA in a Post (neodarwian) Sequencing Era

-


Article: Small RNA Structural Biochemistry in a Post-Sequencing Era: A Critical Perspective by Juan Pablo Tosar (12/23).

The advent of high-throughput sequencing has revolutionized the field of small RNA biology, enabling the identification and characterization of a vast and diverse landscape of these essential molecules. However, sequencing alone provides a limited, one-dimensional view of the transcriptome, neglecting the crucial role of RNA structure in its functionality. This limitations necessitate a shift towards a structure-centric approach in the post-sequencing era to fully understand the intricate world of small RNAs.

Juan Pablo Tosar, in his insightful article in Nature Protocols, emphasizes the need for integrating structural methodologies into the study of small RNAs. He argues that while sequencing provides valuable data regarding the sequences and expression levels of small RNAs, it fails to capture the intricate details of their three-dimensional architecture. This lack of structural information severely hinders the understanding of crucial aspects like RNA stability, turnover, and function.

Tesar meticulously dissects the limitations of the traditional "sequence, map, and annotate" approach. He highlights the inherent biases and uncertainties associated with sequencing technologies, which can lead to misleading interpretations of data. He exemplifies this by pointing out how noncoding RNA fragments often exist as dimers, tetramers, or nicked forms, contrary to the common assumption of their linear nature. This emphasizes the need for caution when drawing conclusions based solely on sequence information.

To address these limitations, Tosar advocates for the adoption of a comprehensive strategy that integrates structure-centric methods with sequencing data. He outlines several valuable bias-reducing strategies, including the use of different sequencing libraries and normalization techniques. He also emphasizes the importance of orthogonal experimental techniques, such as X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy, to validate sequencing data and provide crucial structural insights.

The article delves deeper into specific methodologies valuable for small RNA structural biochemistry. Tosar discusses the use of SHAPE and DMS probing to map RNA secondary structures and identify functionally important regions. He then explores the applications of in-line probing and hydroxyl radical cleavage for analyzing RNA-protein interactions and investigating the dynamics of RNA folding.

Furthermore, Tosar highlights the emerging field of RNA fragmentomics, which focuses on characterizing the diverse population of RNA fragments generated through various cellular processes. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the structure of these fragments to decipher their specific functions and biological implications.

The article concludes by emphasizing the need for collaboration between biochemists, bioinformaticians, and computational biologists to unlock the full potential of small RNA research in the post-sequencing era. Tosar envisions a future where integrating sequencing data with high-resolution structural information will lead to a comprehensive understanding of the roles of small RNAs in various biological processes, paving the way for the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Key takeaways:

  • Sequencing alone provides a limited view of small RNAs, neglecting the crucial role of structure.

  • A structure-centric approach is essential for understanding small RNA function, stability, and turnover.

  • Traditional "sequence, map, and annotate" approach has limitations and biases.

  • Integrating orthogonal experimental techniques like X-ray crystallography and NMR is crucial.

  • Specific methodologies like SHAPE, DMS probing, in-line probing, and RNA fragmentomics provide valuable structural insights.

  • Collaboration between biochemists, bioinformaticians, and computational biologists is vital.

  • This integrated approach promises to unlock the full potential of small RNA research.

Additional notes:

  • The article provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of small RNA structural biochemistry.

  • It offers valuable insights and practical guidance for researchers in the field.

  • The article emphasizes the importance of collaboration and interdisciplinary approaches.

  • It highlights the exciting future of small RNA research in the post-sequencing era.


Small RNA Biochemistry: A Challenge to Neo-Darwinism?


NeoDarwinian sequence hypothesis

Tosar argues that its one-dimensional view and inherent biases often lead to misinterpretations and flawed conclusions. This raises important questions for neo-Darwinian theory, which relies heavily on DNA sequencing data to explain evolution.

One of the key challenges highlighted by Tosar is the dominance of the "sequence, map, and annotate" approach in small RNA research. This approach assumes a direct link between RNA sequence and function, neglecting the crucial role of structure. However, Tosar argues that non-coding RNA fragments, particularly those derived from dimers, tetramers, or nicked forms, often exhibit functions distinct from their parental RNAs. This suggests that relying solely on neo darwinian sequence information can lead to overlooking significant aspects of RNA function and evolution.

Furthermore, Tosar emphasizes the limitations of current sequencing methods in capturing the three-dimensional structure of RNA molecules. This structural information is crucial for understanding RNA stability, turnover, and ultimately, function. As Tosar points out, existing data suggests that many non-coding RNA fragments exist as dimers, tetramers, or nicked forms, contradicting the widespread assumption of their existence as individual units. This highlights the need for complementary techniques that can provide information beyond just sequence data.

The limitations of current NeoDarwinian sequencing methods are not merely technical challenges. They have profound implications for our understanding of evolution and the role of small RNAs in shaping biological diversity. Neo-Darwinian theory, which primarily focuses on random mutations and natural selection acting on DNA sequences, does not  capture the complex interplay between RNA structure and function. The existence of non-coding RNA fragments with distinct functions and the importance of 3D structure suggest that additional factors beyond DNA mutations may be driving evolutionary change.

Tasar's article calls for a shift in emphasis from a purely sequence-based approach to one that incorporates structural information and acknowledges the limitations of current sequencing methods. This requires integrating orthogonal experimental techniques, such as X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, alongside sequencing data. By moving beyond the one-dimensional view, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of small RNAs and their role in evolution, challenging the fundamental assumptions of neo-Darwinism.

In conclusion, Tosar's article provides a valuable critique of current methodologies in small RNA research and highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of RNA structure and function. This challenges neo-Darwinism's reliance on DNA sequence data and opens new avenues for exploring the complex relationship between RNA and evolution. As we move beyond the limitations of sequencing technology, we may discover that the mechanisms driving biological diversity are far richer and more intricate than previously thought.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, the EES is not just a add on to Neo-Darwinism aka the Modern Synthesis

-
Image
" The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis fthe theory of evolution) are, if not outright overturned replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution (EES). So, not to mince words , the Modern Synthesis is gone" -Eugene Koonin, an evolutionary biologist (Cited by over 270,000 evolutionary scientists.) The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) represents a significant departure from the traditional neo-Darwinian framework, also known as the Modern Synthesis . While both theories aim to explain evolutionary change, they differ fundamentally in their underlying mechanisms and the roles they assign to various biological processes. A crucial point of divergence lies in the interpretation and application of the term " evolutionary ," particularly concerning the incorporation of epigenetic mechanisms....
Read more

Is the random mutational model of evolution on its way out?

-
Image
While the random mutational model of evolution has long been a cornerstone of evolutionary biology, the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) and the study of epigenetics are challenging its core assumptions. The Random Mutational Model and Its Limitations The traditional view of evolution, often called the Modern Synthesis or neo-Darwinism , emphasizes random genetic mutations as the primary source of variation. Natural selection then acts upon this variation, favoring individuals with advantageous traits. This model has been successful in explaining some evolutionary phenomena, but it also has limitations: It struggles to explain complex adaptations: The idea that complex features like the eye or the immune system arose solely through random mutations seems statistically improbable. It overlooks the role of the environment: The traditional model treats the environment as a selective force, but it doesn't fully consider how organisms can actively respond to and s...
Read more

ERVs and Common Descent: A Reassessment in Light of Recent Findings

-
Image
Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have long been considered strong evidence for the common descent of humans and chimpanzees. These remnants of ancient viral infections, embedded in the genomes of both species, were once thought to be non-functional "junk DNA." The premise was that the shared presence of these seemingly random insertions in corresponding genomic locations could best be explained by a shared evolutionary history. However, recent research, such as the "Switching Sides" article published in May 2021, has challenged this assumption by demonstrating that ERVs play a functional role in the development of the human embryo and immune system. This discovery raises questions about the validity of using ERVs as primary evidence for common descent. The Traditional Argument for Common Descent The traditional argument for common descent based on ERVs rests on the following points: Random Insertion: Retroviral insertions are thought to occur randomly in...
Read more