Why Extant Species Can't Fully Map Primate Ancestral Homes

-

"Looking at the fossil evidence itself, we see a huge and frustrating gap.

It has become a cliche to say that all we know of hominid life.. can be fitted into a SHOE BOX, and rather a small one at that.

But it should now be quite plain that the very idea of the MISSING LINK, always shaky, is now completely UNTENABLE." -Henry Gee, senior editor of Nature



Why Extant Species Can't Fully Map Primate Ancestral Homes

Understanding where and how our evolutionary ancestors roamed the Earth opens a window into the past, shedding light on diversification, climate influences, and the very origins of our lineage. However, a recent study published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society throws a curveball at this endeavor, revealing a fundamental limitation - extant species alone provide unreliable estimates for ancestral geographical ranges, especially in the deeper reaches of primate phylogeny. They delve into the key findings, implications, and potential solutions to this intriguing biogeographical puzzle.

The researchers, led by Dr. Alexandra Harcourt, employed a unique approach. They constructed a comprehensive phylogeny of over 900 primate and euarchontan species, encompassing both extant and extinct representatives. This enabled them to compare ancestral range estimates derived solely from extant species with those incorporating fossil data. The results were striking. For younger nodes, closer to the present, there was a good degree of concordance between the two methods. However, as they ventured deeper into the evolutionary past, towards the origins of major primate clades around the late Eocene, the estimates based on extant species diverged significantly from those informed by fossils.

This discrepancy suggests that relying solely on currently living primates risks painting an inaccurate picture of ancestral ranges for older nodes. Several factors contribute to this:

  • Incomplete lineage sorting: This phenomenon occurs when ancestral genetic variations persist within living species, blurring the lines between lineages and making it difficult to pinpoint the origin of specific traits, including range distributions.

  • Extinction bias: Fossils are naturally limited, offering only a fragment of past biodiversity. When attempting to reconstruct ancestral ranges using incomplete data, extinct lineages with unique distributions are often overlooked, skewing the estimates towards the extant representatives.

  • Dispersal dynamics: Over long time periods, geographical ranges can shift dramatically through processes like continental drift, climate change, and sweepstakes dispersal, where rare, long-distance dispersal events establish new populations far from the ancestral source. Extant species alone may not capture the full complexity and fluidity of these historical movements.

The implications of this research are profound. If we cannot reliably reconstruct ancestral ranges in the deeper stretches of the primate evolutionary tree, then our understanding of biogeographical patterns and diversification events is shaky. For instance, reconstructing the initial radiation and dispersal of lemurs across continents relies heavily on ancestral range estimates. Without accurate data, our understanding of their evolutionary story remains incomplete.

So, what does this mean for the future of biogeography? The study highlights the crucial role of incorporating fossil data into ancestral range reconstructions, especially for older nodes. Fossil evidence adds vital information that extant species often lack, providing essential anchors for piecing together the biogeographical puzzle. Additionally, employing sophisticated statistical methods that account for factors like incomplete lineage sorting and extinction bias can further improve the accuracy of estimates.

Beyond technical approaches, collaborative efforts involving paleontologists, evolutionary biologists, and biogeographers are crucial. Combining expertise in fossils, molecular data, and ecological modeling can create a more robust framework for reconstructing ancestral ranges. Finally, exploring alternative data sources like environmental proxies and paleoclimate models can offer additional insights into past geographical distributions and their drivers.

In conclusion, the revelation that extant species alone are inadequate for estimating ancestral geographical ranges at older nodes in primate phylogeny presents a significant challenge but also an exciting opportunity. By embracing fossil data, utilizing sophisticated analytical tools, and fostering collaboration, we can push the boundaries of biogeographical knowledge, unveiling the fascinating evolutionary journeys that shaped the primate lineage in all its geographical splendor. This research reminds us that understanding the past is not a solitary endeavor, but a symphony of disciplines working together to harmonize the whispers of extinct ancestors within the chorus of living species. Let us continue to refine our instruments and listen with eager hearts, for the geographical histories waiting to be revealed hold the secrets of our own origins and the rich tapestry of life on Earth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, the EES is not just a add on to Neo-Darwinism aka the Modern Synthesis

-
Image
" The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis fthe theory of evolution) are, if not outright overturned replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution (EES). So, not to mince words , the Modern Synthesis is gone" -Eugene Koonin, an evolutionary biologist (Cited by over 270,000 evolutionary scientists.) The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) represents a significant departure from the traditional neo-Darwinian framework, also known as the Modern Synthesis . While both theories aim to explain evolutionary change, they differ fundamentally in their underlying mechanisms and the roles they assign to various biological processes. A crucial point of divergence lies in the interpretation and application of the term " evolutionary ," particularly concerning the incorporation of epigenetic mechanisms....
Read more

Is the random mutational model of evolution on its way out?

-
Image
While the random mutational model of evolution has long been a cornerstone of evolutionary biology, the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) and the study of epigenetics are challenging its core assumptions. The Random Mutational Model and Its Limitations The traditional view of evolution, often called the Modern Synthesis or neo-Darwinism , emphasizes random genetic mutations as the primary source of variation. Natural selection then acts upon this variation, favoring individuals with advantageous traits. This model has been successful in explaining some evolutionary phenomena, but it also has limitations: It struggles to explain complex adaptations: The idea that complex features like the eye or the immune system arose solely through random mutations seems statistically improbable. It overlooks the role of the environment: The traditional model treats the environment as a selective force, but it doesn't fully consider how organisms can actively respond to and s...
Read more

ERVs and Common Descent: A Reassessment in Light of Recent Findings

-
Image
Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have long been considered strong evidence for the common descent of humans and chimpanzees. These remnants of ancient viral infections, embedded in the genomes of both species, were once thought to be non-functional "junk DNA." The premise was that the shared presence of these seemingly random insertions in corresponding genomic locations could best be explained by a shared evolutionary history. However, recent research, such as the "Switching Sides" article published in May 2021, has challenged this assumption by demonstrating that ERVs play a functional role in the development of the human embryo and immune system. This discovery raises questions about the validity of using ERVs as primary evidence for common descent. The Traditional Argument for Common Descent The traditional argument for common descent based on ERVs rests on the following points: Random Insertion: Retroviral insertions are thought to occur randomly in...
Read more