Origins and Evolution of Novel Bacteroides in Captive Apes challenges neo-Darwinism

-


Nishida and Ochman's (2023) investigation published in "Origins and Evolution of Novel Bacteroides in Captive Apes" delves into the fascinating phenomenon of bacterial adaptation within the gut microbiomes of captive apes. The study centers on Bacteroides xylanisolvens, a bacterium prevalent in humans but uncommon in other ape species.

The researchers capitalized on the unique environment of captive apes to investigate bacterial strain evolution following host switching. They isolated and sequenced bacterial samples from the apes' guts, followed by reconstructing the evolutionary history of these strains since their divergence from human-associated counterparts.

The analyses revealed a captivating trend: multiple captive ape-associated B. xylanisolvens lineages independently acquired gene clusters associated with host mucin metabolism. Mucin, a complex sugar molecule lining the gut, serves as a vital nutrient source for gut bacteria. This independent acquisition signifies a remarkable case of convergent adaptation by the bacteria to their new ape hosts.

This study sheds new light on the intricate interplay between bacteria and their hosts, highlighting the remarkable adaptability of gut bacteria. The captive environment provides a valuable window into this process, as the apes' diet and gut environment deviate significantly from those of their wild counterparts. The findings suggest that gut bacteria possess the remarkable ability to rapidly adapt to novel environments by acquiring genes that empower them to exploit new food sources, such as mucin.

Furthermore, this research contributes significantly to the expanding body of knowledge on the influence of captivity on gut microbiota. The human gut microbiome is well-recognized for its influence on health and disease. Understanding how the gut microbiome adapts in captivity could hold significant implications for the well-being of captive animals.

The study investigates how bacteria adapt to new environments, potentially shedding light on how organisms evolve. The research focuses on the gut bacterium Bacteroides xylanisolvens, which has been found in captive apes but not typically in wild apes.

The findings challenge the idea of a strictly linear common ancestry for all organisms. The captive apes acquired B. xylanisolvens from humans, and the bacteria subsequently evolved new traits to better suit their ape hosts' diets. This highlights how horizontal gene transfer, where organisms acquire genes from other sources, can play a role in evolution without Darwinian vertical inheritance.

In essence, the study suggests that captive apes and B. xylanisolvens co-evolved, with the bacteria adapting to a new niche and the apes potentially benefiting from the bacteria's enhanced ability to process certain food components. This showcases a more complex evolutionary scenario than a simple branching tree.

The study sheds light on how captive environments can influence bacterial evolution in these primates.

The findings challenge neo-Darwinism in the sense that they highlight the role of environmental factors in shaping bacterial adaptation. Neo-Darwinism traditionally emphasizes natural selection as the driving force behind evolution. This study suggests that factors beyond competition and heritable traits can play a significant role.

The captive apes' diet, rich in human-derived foods, likely drove the spread of B. xylanisolvens strains with genes suited to metabolize these novel food sources. This rapid adaptation in response to a new environment emphasizes the adaptability of bacteria and the influence of ecological factors on bacterial evolution apart from Neo-Darwinism.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, the EES is not just a add on to Neo-Darwinism aka the Modern Synthesis

-
Image
" The summary of the state of affairs on the 150th anniversary of the Origin is somewhat shocking: in the post-genomic era, all major tenets of the Modern Synthesis fthe theory of evolution) are, if not outright overturned replaced by a new and incomparably more complex vision of the key aspects of evolution (EES). So, not to mince words , the Modern Synthesis is gone" -Eugene Koonin, an evolutionary biologist (Cited by over 270,000 evolutionary scientists.) The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) represents a significant departure from the traditional neo-Darwinian framework, also known as the Modern Synthesis . While both theories aim to explain evolutionary change, they differ fundamentally in their underlying mechanisms and the roles they assign to various biological processes. A crucial point of divergence lies in the interpretation and application of the term " evolutionary ," particularly concerning the incorporation of epigenetic mechanisms....
Read more

Is the random mutational model of evolution on its way out?

-
Image
While the random mutational model of evolution has long been a cornerstone of evolutionary biology, the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) and the study of epigenetics are challenging its core assumptions. The Random Mutational Model and Its Limitations The traditional view of evolution, often called the Modern Synthesis or neo-Darwinism , emphasizes random genetic mutations as the primary source of variation. Natural selection then acts upon this variation, favoring individuals with advantageous traits. This model has been successful in explaining some evolutionary phenomena, but it also has limitations: It struggles to explain complex adaptations: The idea that complex features like the eye or the immune system arose solely through random mutations seems statistically improbable. It overlooks the role of the environment: The traditional model treats the environment as a selective force, but it doesn't fully consider how organisms can actively respond to and s...
Read more

ERVs and Common Descent: A Reassessment in Light of Recent Findings

-
Image
Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) have long been considered strong evidence for the common descent of humans and chimpanzees. These remnants of ancient viral infections, embedded in the genomes of both species, were once thought to be non-functional "junk DNA." The premise was that the shared presence of these seemingly random insertions in corresponding genomic locations could best be explained by a shared evolutionary history. However, recent research, such as the "Switching Sides" article published in May 2021, has challenged this assumption by demonstrating that ERVs play a functional role in the development of the human embryo and immune system. This discovery raises questions about the validity of using ERVs as primary evidence for common descent. The Traditional Argument for Common Descent The traditional argument for common descent based on ERVs rests on the following points: Random Insertion: Retroviral insertions are thought to occur randomly in...
Read more